Outcome: Dismissed
JAN182024_01B2203
Our summary
Filmmaker with thirty years experience claimed extraordinary ability through awards, membership, published material, and exhibitions. AAO affirmed awards and membership were not met, published material insufficient, and exhibitions alone do not establish sustained national or international acclaim required.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director's determination regarding display of work not disturbed
What was missing
- Awards · Awards submitted lack evidence of national or international recognition; insufficient detail on competition criteria
- Membership · Associations lack documentary evidence that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Published material · Significance of work does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim
- Final merits · Record does not establish applicant among upper echelon; lacks sufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director's determination regarding display of work not disturbed | |
| Not met | Awards submitted lack evidence of national or international recognition; insufficient detail on competition criteria | |
| Not met | Associations lack documentary evidence that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Significance of work does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim | |
| Not met | Record does not establish applicant among upper echelon; lacks sufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
