Outcome: Dismissed
JAN222020_03B2203
Our summary
Software design company petitioned for visual designer beneficiary claiming extraordinary ability. Beneficiary claimed awards, leading role, and one other criterion. AAO found only two criteria met, insufficient for eligibility, and did not reach final merits determination.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Collective awards do not establish individual recognition; beneficiary name not shown
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Collective awards do not establish individual recognition; beneficiary name not shown | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Case did not proceed to final merits; insufficient criteria met at threshold |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
