Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided January 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN222020_03B2203

AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Software design company petitioned for visual designer beneficiary claiming extraordinary ability. Beneficiary claimed awards, leading role, and one other criterion. AAO found only two criteria met, insufficient for eligibility, and did not reach final merits determination.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Collective awards do not establish individual recognition; beneficiary name not shown

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metCollective awards do not establish individual recognition; beneficiary name not shown
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedCase did not proceed to final merits; insufficient criteria met at threshold

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.