A postdoctoral neuroscience researcher seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree petition demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong: substantial merit and national importance of her proposed research. However, she failed the second prong because her academic accomplishments, citations, and letters of support were insufficient to show she is well positioned to advance the endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

A postdoctoral researcher in metabolic diseases sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. She satisfied the first prong (substantial merit and national importance) but failed the second: she lacked a clear plan, institutional commitment, or funding evidence to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance her work, so the appeal was dismissed.

Language testing researcher and machine learning engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed advanced degree eligibility but dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and petitioner not well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Nutritionist sought NIW to start nutrition counseling company in Florida. AAO dismissed because petitioner lacked qualifying advanced degree and failed to establish national importance; serving individual clients in a STEM profession lacks sufficiently broad implications for the field.