Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided January 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN222026_05B2203

Published materialMetAwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metMembershipNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Digital marketing and computer vision entrepreneur self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed five evidentiary criteria but met only one regarding published articles. AAO withdrew SCOPS salary finding and affirmed that petitioner failed three-criterion threshold for immigrant visa eligibility.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Published material · Articles about petitioner in field publications established by SCOPS and affirmed

What was missing

  • Awards · Startup program acceptance not an award; venture capital funding received by company not petitioner
  • High salary · SCOPS determination withdrawn; salary evidence insufficient for comparison standard
  • Membership · Program entry criteria reflect minimum entrepreneurial expertise, not outstanding achievements

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Published materialMetArticles about petitioner in field publications established by SCOPS and affirmed
AwardsNot metStartup program acceptance not an award; venture capital funding received by company not petitioner
High salaryNot metSCOPS determination withdrawn; salary evidence insufficient for comparison standard
MembershipNot metProgram entry criteria reflect minimum entrepreneurial expertise, not outstanding achievements
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed in prior SCOPS decision or appeal
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed in prior SCOPS decision or appeal
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed in prior SCOPS decision or appeal
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed in prior SCOPS decision or appeal
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed in prior SCOPS decision or appeal
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedFailed to meet three criteria threshold; final merits not reached

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.