Outcome: Dismissed
JAN232025_01B2203
Our summary
A chemical engineer in nondestructive testing claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, asserting four criteria beyond the initial set. The AAO affirmed denial, finding membership not established, original contributions not evidenced, leading role lacking sufficient detail, and other criteria unmet. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award received
- Leading or critical role · Insufficient detail on critical importance to organization; contractors lacked distinguished reputations
- Membership · Membership not established; association requirements for outstanding achievements not met
- Original contributions · No evidence of original contributions of major significance submitted
- Final merits · Did not meet minimum three evidentiary criteria required
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award received | |
| Not met | Insufficient detail on critical importance to organization; contractors lacked distinguished reputations | |
| Not met | Membership not established; association requirements for outstanding achievements not met | |
| Not met | No evidence of original contributions of major significance submitted | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not reached because petitioner failed to meet three other claimed criteria | |
| Not met | Did not meet minimum three evidentiary criteria required |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
