Outcome: Dismissed
JAN292021_12B2203
Our summary
A CEO and business training center founder claimed seven criteria for extraordinary ability, satisfying three initially. The AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim, with media coverage local rather than national, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Served as panel judge and expert council member for competitions
- Leading or critical role · Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion
- Published material · Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion
What was missing
- Awards · Magazine nomination and appearance insufficient evidence of nationally recognized award receipt
- Final merits · Media coverage primarily local; petitioner not shown to be among small percentage at top of field despite meeting three criteria
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Served as panel judge and expert council member for competitions | |
| Met | Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion | |
| Met | Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion | |
| Not met | Magazine nomination and appearance insufficient evidence of nationally recognized award receipt | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Not met | Media coverage primarily local; petitioner not shown to be among small percentage at top of field despite meeting three criteria |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
