Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided January 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN292021_12B2203

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A CEO and business training center founder claimed seven criteria for extraordinary ability, satisfying three initially. The AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim, with media coverage local rather than national, dismissing the appeal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Served as panel judge and expert council member for competitions
  • Leading or critical role · Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion
  • Published material · Director's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion

What was missing

  • Awards · Magazine nomination and appearance insufficient evidence of nationally recognized award receipt
  • Final merits · Media coverage primarily local; petitioner not shown to be among small percentage at top of field despite meeting three criteria

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetServed as panel judge and expert council member for competitions
Leading or critical roleMetDirector's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion
Published materialMetDirector's determination satisfied; AAO found record supported this criterion
AwardsNot metMagazine nomination and appearance insufficient evidence of nationally recognized award receipt
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Final meritsNot metMedia coverage primarily local; petitioner not shown to be among small percentage at top of field despite meeting three criteria

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.