Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AEducation and academiaIndividualDecided January 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN292026_03B2203

AwardsNot metJudgingNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Teacher claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met zero of the evidentiary criteria claimed; awards lack recognition, memberships unsubstantiated, published material insufficient, judging participation undocumented. Threshold of three criteria not met.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards lack documentation showing national or international recognition for excellence in field.
  • Judging · Documentation does not establish petitioner actually participated as judge in same or allied field; lacks pertinent details.
  • Membership · Memberships not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
  • Published material · Article published in Jamaica Observer does not establish published material about petitioner relating to work in field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metAwards lack documentation showing national or international recognition for excellence in field.
JudgingNot metDocumentation does not establish petitioner actually participated as judge in same or allied field; lacks pertinent details.
MembershipNot metMemberships not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Published materialNot metArticle published in Jamaica Observer does not establish published material about petitioner relating to work in field.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner cannot satisfy threshold of three criteria.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner cannot satisfy threshold of three criteria.
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedNot reached because petitioner failed to meet threshold initial evidence requirement of three criteria.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.