A global financial services company petitioned for an NIW for a beneficiary developing AI and machine learning solutions. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary's work, though valuable to the employer, lacked broader industry implications necessary to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

An employer petitioned for an assistant vice president's EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for developing machine learning and advanced analytics tools for market risk management. The AAO affirmed denial; while the work had substantial merit, employer failed to establish it had national importance or impact beyond the specific employer.

A digital marketing company sponsors a data scientist for EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO found the beneficiary qualified for EB-2 with an advanced degree and the endeavor has substantial merit, but rejected the waiver because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the proposed work has national importance, only that STEM fields are important generally.

A data scientist employer-petitioner for EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed proposed work in AI and technology would benefit national interest. AAO found endeavor lacks national importance—impact limited to employer and customers without broader field effects. Court reserved second and third prong analysis, dismissing appeal on first prong failure.