A businessman claiming extraordinary ability was denied by service center. AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for procedural defects. Subsequent motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because petitioner submitted no new documentary facts or legal errors, only duplicative arguments and prior decisions.

Petitioner appealed dismissal of motion to reopen and reconsider prior NIW denial. AAO held appeal concerns only procedural motion dismissal not underlying petition denial; petitioner waived substantive arguments by not appealing original denial and failing to articulate legal error in motion dismissal.

A singer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. After denial and a summary dismissal of the appeal, the petitioner filed a motion to reopen. The AAO dismissed the motion as untimely, since it was filed 105 days after the decision and the delay was not shown to be reasonable or beyond his control.

A self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification, and the appeal was previously summarily dismissed along with earlier motions. On a second combined motion, the AAO dismissed both the motion to reopen and the motion to reconsider because no new facts, brief, evidence, or legal error were shown. No criteria were decided.