EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided July 2024Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUL112024_01B2203
AwardsMetExhibitionsMetPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A furniture designer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed three criteria: awards, published material, and exhibitions. The AAO found he met awards and exhibitions criteria but failed published material because he provided no objective evidence establishing that articles were published in major media or professional trade publications.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Petitioner satisfied criterion for lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards.
- Exhibitions · Petitioner satisfied criterion for work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
What was missing
- Published material · Articles about petitioner exist but not proven to be in professional or major trade publications or major media; no objective circulation data, rankings, or website traffic comparisons submitted.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Met | Petitioner satisfied criterion for lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards. |
 Exhibitions | Met | Petitioner satisfied criterion for work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases. |
 Published material | Not met | Articles about petitioner exist but not proven to be in professional or major trade publications or major media; no objective circulation data, rankings, or website traffic comparisons submitted. |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Petitioner failed to meet three-criteria threshold; final merits determination reserved per Bagamasbad rule. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.