Outcome: Dismissed
JUL122005_01B2203
Our summary
Electrical engineer, self-petitioner, claimed membership and judging roles as evidence of extraordinary ability. AAO found IEEE membership based on education not outstanding achievement, and peer review participation occasional and administrative, failing to establish at least three criteria or sustained top-level acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Peer review participation occasional and administrative; does not demonstrate sustained acclaim at top level
- Membership · IEEE membership based on education and employment, not outstanding achievement
- Final merits · Evidence does not set petitioner apart; lacks sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Peer review participation occasional and administrative; does not demonstrate sustained acclaim at top level | |
| Not met | IEEE membership based on education and employment, not outstanding achievement | |
| Not met | Evidence does not set petitioner apart; lacks sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
