Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL132005_07B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A Chinese acrobat claiming extraordinary ability in athletics and arts submitted evidence of local awards, association membership, and performances. AAO found no criterion met, determining awards lacked national or international recognition and membership did not require outstanding achievement.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Certificates from Chinese acrobatic organizations lack evidence of significant national or international stature and widespread recognition
  • Membership · Membership required five years career experience and provincial-level achievement, not outstanding achievement evaluated at national or international level
  • Published material · Evidence does not demonstrate published material primarily about petitioner in professional or major trade publications
  • Final merits · Does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at very top of acrobatics field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metCertificates from Chinese acrobatic organizations lack evidence of significant national or international stature and widespread recognition
MembershipNot metMembership required five years career experience and provincial-level achievement, not outstanding achievement evaluated at national or international level
Published materialNot metEvidence does not demonstrate published material primarily about petitioner in professional or major trade publications
Final meritsNot metDoes not establish sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at very top of acrobatics field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.