Outcome: Dismissed
JUL142021_03B2203
Our summary
Tax accountant seeks extraordinary ability classification. Met three criteria on initial evidence; however, final merits determination found no sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at field top, warranting dismissal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · Remuneration significantly high in relation to others in field
- Leading or critical role · Director found leading role for distinguished organizations
- Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner authored scholarly articles in business field
What was missing
- Published material · Articles about Chinese tax system and infrastructure, not about petitioner or his work
- Final merits · Totality of evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Remuneration significantly high in relation to others in field | |
| Met | Director found leading role for distinguished organizations | |
| Met | Director found petitioner authored scholarly articles in business field | |
| Not met | Articles about Chinese tax system and infrastructure, not about petitioner or his work | |
| Not met | Totality of evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
