Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABiotech and pharmaIndividualDecided 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL152021_02B2203

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetAwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Quality assurance associate in pharmaceutical industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed four criteria; director found two met. AAO dismissed, holding petitioner failed to meet three of ten required criteria and lacks the sustained acclaim and top-tier recognition required.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found petitioner participated as judge of work of others in field
  • Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner held leading or critical roles at distinguished organizations

What was missing

  • Awards · No major internationally recognized award demonstrated
  • High salary · Above-average salary does not equate to high salary in relation to others in field
  • Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found petitioner participated as judge of work of others in field
Leading or critical roleMetDirector found petitioner held leading or critical roles at distinguished organizations
AwardsNot metNo major internationally recognized award demonstrated
High salaryNot metAbove-average salary does not equate to high salary in relation to others in field
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner mentioned in conclusion but did not raise on appeal
Final meritsNot metRecord does not support sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.