Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalIndividualDecided July 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL162024_08B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A nutritionist sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to practice without a job offer, claiming their work would reduce diet-related disease and improve public health. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked the national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong, as general industry importance and broad assertions without specific evidence of prospective impact do not suffice.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed nutritionist work lacks national importance; general health benefits insufficient without specific prospective impact.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metProposed nutritionist work lacks national importance; general health benefits insufficient without specific prospective impact.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached; first prong dispositive, second and third prongs reserved.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached; first prong dispositive, second and third prongs reserved.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.