Outcome: Dismissed
JUL162024_08B5203
Our summary
A nutritionist sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to practice without a job offer, claiming their work would reduce diet-related disease and improve public health. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked the national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong, as general industry importance and broad assertions without specific evidence of prospective impact do not suffice.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed nutritionist work lacks national importance; general health benefits insufficient without specific prospective impact.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Proposed nutritionist work lacks national importance; general health benefits insufficient without specific prospective impact. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached; first prong dispositive, second and third prongs reserved. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached; first prong dispositive, second and third prongs reserved. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
