Outcome: Dismissed
JUL172024_12B5203
Our summary
An information technology entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable findings on some criteria, concluded the petitioner did not satisfy the minimum number of threshold criteria, skipped the final merits step, and reserved the Dhanasar analysis, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
