Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipIndividualDecided July 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL172024_12B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

An information technology entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable findings on some criteria, concluded the petitioner did not satisfy the minimum number of threshold criteria, skipped the final merits step, and reserved the Dhanasar analysis, dismissing the appeal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedReserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedReserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedReserved because the petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.