A petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification for a beneficiary in the sciences but failed to file a detailed appeal brief within thirty days as promised. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for lack of specific identification of errors and failure to submit additional supporting documentation.

Beneficiary claimed extraordinary ability in the arts. Appeal summarily dismissed because petitioner's counsel failed to identify specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact, only asserting director misapplied discretionary authority and never submitting promised supplemental brief.

EB-1A petition for alien of extraordinary ability in the arts. Petition filed by petitioner on behalf of beneficiary. Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact; no supplemental documentation provided over 21 months.

A self-petitioner sought EB-1A classification in business claiming extraordinary ability. The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact on appeal and provided no substantive briefing despite having 30 days to do so.