EB-1AData science and analyticsEmployerDecided 2020Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUL212020_01B2203
Scholarly articlesMetJudgingNot metMembershipNot metFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Computer scientist employed in data science seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed denial because applicant met only one of three required evidentiary criteria. Scholarly articles alone insufficient; no evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier field placement.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Scholarly articles · Director's finding affirmed; applicant authored scholarly articles in professional publications
What was missing
- Judging · Invitations to judge received but no evidence demonstrating applicant actually completed reviewing or judging work
- Membership · ACM committee memberships do not require outstanding achievements as essential condition; no evidence of expert judging
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Scholarly articles | Met | Director's finding affirmed; applicant authored scholarly articles in professional publications |
 Judging | Not met | Invitations to judge received but no evidence demonstrating applicant actually completed reviewing or judging work |
 Membership | Not met | ACM committee memberships do not require outstanding achievements as essential condition; no evidence of expert judging |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Only one criterion clearly met; two required minimum not reached. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.