Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL222026_04B2203

JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetAwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A cloud engineer sought extraordinary ability classification through five criteria. The AAO affirmed that she met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), did not meet the threshold of three required criteria, and lacked demonstrated sustained acclaim for the elite classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Petitioner met criterion for participation as judge of work of others
  • Scholarly articles · Petitioner met criterion for authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications

What was missing

  • Awards · No major, internationally recognized one-time achievement claimed or established
  • Leading or critical role · No evidence petitioner performed in leading or critical role at distinguished organizations
  • Published material · Submitted articles not published in professional or major trade publications or major media
  • Final merits · Only two of three required criteria met; insufficient sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetPetitioner met criterion for participation as judge of work of others
Scholarly articlesMetPetitioner met criterion for authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications
AwardsNot metNo major, internationally recognized one-time achievement claimed or established
Leading or critical roleNot metNo evidence petitioner performed in leading or critical role at distinguished organizations
Published materialNot metSubmitted articles not published in professional or major trade publications or major media
Final meritsNot metOnly two of three required criteria met; insufficient sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.