A postdoctoral researcher sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research on neuron cell biology and nanotechnology-based medical devices. The AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: substantial merit and national importance, researcher well positioned to advance work, and balance favoring waiver. Appeal sustained.

Medical physicist sought EB-2 classification with NIW, proposing radiation therapy detector research using CdTe semiconductor material. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance it.

Physical therapist with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver to develop innovative techniques for paralysis disorders. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific endeavor; impact limited to individual patients.

Information technology and telecommunications entrepreneur self-petitioner seeking national interest waiver under EB-2. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner met underlying EB-2 requirements but failed to demonstrate national importance; proposed cloud and 5G infrastructure services were not differentiated from existing providers.