Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AEnergy and climateIndividualDecided 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL302026_01B2203

High salaryMetJudgingMetOriginal contributionsMetPublished materialMetScholarly articlesMetAwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Petroleum reservoir and production engineer with expertise in hydraulic fracturing and pressure transient analysis claims extraordinary ability. Met five initial evidentiary criteria, exceeding three-criterion threshold. However, AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or elite accomplishment level required for extraordinary ability classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • High salary · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
  • Judging · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
  • Original contributions · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
  • Published material · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
  • Scholarly articles · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria

What was missing

  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at field top

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
High salaryMetUSCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
JudgingMetUSCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
Original contributionsMetUSCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
Published materialMetUSCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
Scholarly articlesMetUSCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim or establish major internationally recognized award
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at field top

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.