Outcome: Dismissed
JUL302026_01B2203
Our summary
Petroleum reservoir and production engineer with expertise in hydraulic fracturing and pressure transient analysis claims extraordinary ability. Met five initial evidentiary criteria, exceeding three-criterion threshold. However, AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or elite accomplishment level required for extraordinary ability classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
- Judging · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
- Original contributions · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
- Published material · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
- Scholarly articles · USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria
What was missing
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at field top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria | |
| Met | USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria | |
| Met | USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria | |
| Met | USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria | |
| Met | USCIS determined criterion met; petitioner satisfied one of five claimed criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim or establish major internationally recognized award | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed in record; petitioner appealed on other criteria | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at field top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
