Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceEmployerDecided July 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL312024_13B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Human rights attorney sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. While demonstrating exceptional ability and current human rights work, petitioner failed to articulate a specific future endeavor with substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar. Continuing employment in current position does not constitute sufficient proposed endeavor.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to establish specific future endeavor with both substantial merit and national importance; employment continuation alone insufficient

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metPetitioner failed to establish specific future endeavor with both substantial merit and national importance; employment continuation alone insufficient
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.