EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN022005_06B2203
Original contributionsMetAwardsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Acrobat performer claimed extraordinary ability in arts. Met original contributions criterion through documented unique techniques and style influence but failed awards and published material criteria. AAO found only two criteria met when three required; dismissed for lack of sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Original contributions · Unique acrobatic techniques and knockabout style influence documented through expert letters.
What was missing
- Awards · Wallace awards not established as nationally recognized beyond Queensland region.
- Published material · Reviews not primarily about beneficiary; publications lack evidence of major circulation.
- Final merits · Talent shown but achievements insufficient to establish sustained national acclaim at top.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Original contributions | Met | Unique acrobatic techniques and knockabout style influence documented through expert letters. |
 Awards | Not met | Wallace awards not established as nationally recognized beyond Queensland region. |
 Published material | Not met | Reviews not primarily about beneficiary; publications lack evidence of major circulation. |
 Final merits | Not met | Talent shown but achievements insufficient to establish sustained national acclaim at top. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.