EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN022005_15B2203
JudgingNot metLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Business intelligence systems analyst sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed judging, original contributions, and critical role criteria. The AAO found letters and evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim; petitioner did not demonstrate he rose to the very top of his field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Judging limited to employment duties; does not reflect sustained acclaim beyond work requirements.
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner failed to establish nature of role within organization or reputation with supporting documentary evidence.
- Original contributions · Letters insufficient; do not demonstrate work made major contributions or reflected sustained acclaim in the field.
- Final merits · Evidence indicates talent but does not establish petitioner is within the small percentage at the very top.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Judging | Not met | Judging limited to employment duties; does not reflect sustained acclaim beyond work requirements. |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | Petitioner failed to establish nature of role within organization or reputation with supporting documentary evidence. |
 Original contributions | Not met | Letters insufficient; do not demonstrate work made major contributions or reflected sustained acclaim in the field. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence indicates talent but does not establish petitioner is within the small percentage at the very top. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.