EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsEmployerDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN022005_16B2203
Original contributionsMetAwardsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Acrobatic performer claimed extraordinary ability through awards, publications, and original contributions. AAO found awards not nationally recognized, publications lacked major-media status, but original contribution criterion met through evidence of innovative style. Overall record failed to meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate sustained international acclaim at highest level.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Original contributions · Letters attesting beneficiary and partner set standard for balancing technique and style in knockabout acrobatics
What was missing
- Awards · Wallace awards not nationally recognized; no evidence entertainers beyond Queensland compete
- Published material · Publications not major media; director correctly noted lack of circulation data; live performers not typically covered nationally
- Final merits · Only two criteria met; beneficiary shows talent but achievements do not set him significantly above all others at very top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Original contributions | Met | Letters attesting beneficiary and partner set standard for balancing technique and style in knockabout acrobatics |
 Awards | Not met | Wallace awards not nationally recognized; no evidence entertainers beyond Queensland compete |
 Published material | Not met | Publications not major media; director correctly noted lack of circulation data; live performers not typically covered nationally |
 Final merits | Not met | Only two criteria met; beneficiary shows talent but achievements do not set him significantly above all others at very top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.