Outcome: Dismissed
JUN022020_01B2203
Our summary
Fashion model petitioned for extraordinary ability. Claimed seven criteria without meeting three-criterion standard. Petitioner failed comparable evidence showing and did not establish criteria satisfaction. Appeal dismissed due to insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim among upper echelon models.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Stars of Venezuela Award not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
- Final merits · Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Stars of Venezuela Award not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed as comparable evidence but not properly analyzed. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed as artistic display but treated as comparable evidence without proper analysis. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but insufficient evidence of major media significance demonstrated. | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
