Outcome: Dismissed
JUN062019_02B2203
Our summary
Manufacturing company president and founder seeking extraordinary ability classification. Met one criterion: leading or critical role based on distinguished company reputation. Failed to meet original contributions and high salary criteria despite additional appeal evidence. AAO dismissed, finding only one criterion met, below three required, and no sustained national acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner established leading or critical role as founder with company having distinguished reputation
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award indicated or established
- High salary · Income documentation insufficient to establish high salary in relation to others in field
- Original contributions · Company success not shown to represent original contributions of major significance to field
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentile status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner established leading or critical role as founder with company having distinguished reputation | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award indicated or established | |
| Not met | Income documentation insufficient to establish high salary in relation to others in field | |
| Not met | Company success not shown to represent original contributions of major significance to field | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentile status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
