Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AAgriculture and foodIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN102005_07B2203

JudgingNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Food scientist claimed extraordinary ability through membership, publications, judging, and other criteria. AAO rejected membership, published material in directories, and editorial judging as insufficient. Letters from colleagues in single province not national experts. Overall evidence fails to show sustained national acclaim or presence at top level.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Judging · Editorial duties not indicative of national or international acclaim; role significance not established
  • Membership · Petitioner failed to establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
  • Published material · Appearing in directories as one of thousands insufficient; biographies not in qualifying media
  • Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national acclaim or distinction among top food scientists in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingNot metEditorial duties not indicative of national or international acclaim; role significance not established
MembershipNot metPetitioner failed to establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Published materialNot metAppearing in directories as one of thousands insufficient; biographies not in qualifying media
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Final meritsNot metRecord does not establish sustained national acclaim or distinction among top food scientists in field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.