EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided June 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN102025_01B5203
Merit and national importanceMetWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Merit and national importance · Endeavor in privacy-preserving technology and IoT has substantial merit and national importance
What was missing
- Well positioned · Petitioner lacks concrete plan, employment offer, or evidence of employer interest despite having strong education and cited research
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Met | Endeavor in privacy-preserving technology and IoT has substantial merit and national importance |
 Well positioned | Not met | Petitioner lacks concrete plan, employment offer, or evidence of employer interest despite having strong education and cited research |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because second prong failed; Dhanasar framework requires success on all three prongs |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.