Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided June 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN112024_02B2203

AwardsNot metJudgingNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A television producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner satisfied fewer than three of the required ten regulatory criteria. She failed to establish a major award, proper professional association membership, contemporaneous published material about her, and judging participation that existed at the time of filing.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No evidence of major, internationally recognized one-time achievement award.
  • Judging · Approved jury panel participation was scheduled for 2022, years after 2020 petition filing, so does not establish eligibility at time of filing.
  • Membership · Membership in Union of Journalists of Kazakhstan does not require outstanding achievements judged by national or international experts as required by criterion.
  • Published material · Newspaper article cited was published in 2022, after 2020 petition filing, so does not establish eligibility at time of filing.
  • Final merits · Petitioner did not establish three of ten required criteria; record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo evidence of major, internationally recognized one-time achievement award.
JudgingNot metApproved jury panel participation was scheduled for 2022, years after 2020 petition filing, so does not establish eligibility at time of filing.
MembershipNot metMembership in Union of Journalists of Kazakhstan does not require outstanding achievements judged by national or international experts as required by criterion.
Published materialNot metNewspaper article cited was published in 2022, after 2020 petition filing, so does not establish eligibility at time of filing.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedSeventh criterion not analyzed; only four of seven claimed criteria reviewed before threshold failure determined.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFifth criterion not analyzed; only four of seven claimed criteria reviewed before threshold failure determined.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedSixth criterion not analyzed; only four of seven claimed criteria reviewed before threshold failure determined.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner did not establish three of ten required criteria; record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.