Outcome: Dismissed
JUN112024_14B5203
Our summary
An advanced degree professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver for work improving oil and gas extraction processes. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance due to inconsistent and vague descriptions of specific plans and insufficient evidence of prospective economic effects.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor regarding oil extraction or fracking improvements too vague and inconsistent; insufficient evidence of prospective national impact.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Proposed endeavor regarding oil extraction or fracking improvements too vague and inconsistent; insufficient evidence of prospective national impact. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; agency reserved analysis of third prong. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; agency reserved analysis of third prong. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
