Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaIndividualDecided June 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN132025_05B5203

Merit and national importanceMetWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Biomedical scientist with Ph.D. sought NIW for postdoctoral research on nanomembranes for cancer treatment. AAO found substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance the endeavor through lack of sustained funding, clear research plan, or stakeholder interest.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Merit and national importance · Decision withdrew service center's conclusion; research has potential broad implications in critical STEM field.

What was missing

  • Well positioned · No consistent documentation of research plan; insufficient demonstrated interest from investors or stakeholders; funding ended.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceMetDecision withdrew service center's conclusion; research has potential broad implications in critical STEM field.
Well positionedNot metNo consistent documentation of research plan; insufficient demonstrated interest from investors or stakeholders; funding ended.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because second prong failed; decision reserved arguments on this issue.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.