Outcome: Dismissed
JUN172005_01B2203
Our summary
Traditional Indian tabla musician sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found no criteria met: awards lack documented significance, memberships do not require outstanding achievement, no national media coverage, insufficient documentation of influence or acclaim, and no evidence of top national performances or commercial success.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No documentation showing number of recipients, selection criteria, or level of recognition of awards
- Commercial success · No evidence of record, cassette, or compact disc sales prior to petition filing date
- Exhibitions · No evidence of performances at top national venues as featured musician with national or international reputation
- Judging · Insufficient evidence of judging other musicians' work at national or international level
- Membership · Membership in associations does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Original contributions · No extensive documentation showing work has been unusually influential or acclaimed nationally or internationally
- Published material · No evidence of material primarily about petitioner in professional or major publications or national media
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at very top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No documentation showing number of recipients, selection criteria, or level of recognition of awards | |
| Not met | No evidence of record, cassette, or compact disc sales prior to petition filing date | |
| Not met | No evidence of performances at top national venues as featured musician with national or international reputation | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of judging other musicians' work at national or international level | |
| Not met | Membership in associations does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Not met | No extensive documentation showing work has been unusually influential or acclaimed nationally or internationally | |
| Not met | No evidence of material primarily about petitioner in professional or major publications or national media | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at very top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
