Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided June 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN182024_10B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A legal consultant sought EB-2 NIW classification with advanced degree. The AAO found she failed to establish five years progressive experience required for advanced degree professional status, thus ineligible for underlying EB-2 classification. Even considering Dhanasar merits, the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; insufficient prospective impact evidence.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metProposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; insufficient prospective impact evidence.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; remaining Dhanasar prongs not reached.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; remaining Dhanasar prongs not reached.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.