Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWOtherIndividualDecided June 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN272024_05B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A petitioner sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because no employment letters showing five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience were submitted, so underlying eligibility failed and the Dhanasar analysis was reserved.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedReserved because underlying EB-2 advanced degree eligibility was not established.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached since underlying EB-2 classification failed.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached since underlying EB-2 classification failed.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.