Outcome: Remanded
JUN272025_04B5203
Our summary
Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Service center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Service center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Service center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
