Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceEmployerDecided June 2025Remanded

Outcome: Remanded

JUN272025_04B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedService center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedService center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedService center decision stated legal requirements but did not discuss evidence or specific insufficiencies

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.