Outcome: Dismissed
Jan112011_03B2203
Our summary
Actress petitioner claimed extraordinary ability in performing arts, relying on awards and memberships. AAO found petitioner established evidence of only one award, failing the requirement for multiple nationally or internationally recognized prizes, and did not demonstrate sustained acclaim at the top of her field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner submitted evidence of only one award meeting regulatory standard, but criterion requires multiple nationally or internationally recognized prizes.
- Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner submitted evidence of only one award meeting regulatory standard, but criterion requires multiple nationally or internationally recognized prizes. | |
| Not met | Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in small percentage at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
