Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherEmployerDecided 2007Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Jan172007_02B2203

AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Employer-sponsored petition for beneficiary claiming extraordinary ability. Director found beneficiary failed to meet three regulatory criteria. Appeal summarily dismissed because petitioner failed to provide specific arguments challenging findings or promised evidence within nine months.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedAppeal dismissed summarily; no substantive merits analysis conducted

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.