Outcome: Dismissed
Jan172007_02B2203
Our summary
Employer-sponsored petition for beneficiary claiming extraordinary ability. Director found beneficiary failed to meet three regulatory criteria. Appeal summarily dismissed because petitioner failed to provide specific arguments challenging findings or promised evidence within nine months.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient evidentiary submission on appeal | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Appeal dismissed summarily; no substantive merits analysis conducted |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
