Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2011Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Jul072011_01B2203

AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

An artist sought extraordinary ability classification, and counsel on appeal asserted that four criteria were met, covering awards, judging, exhibitions and commercial success. The appeal was summarily dismissed because counsel identified no specific error in the denial and the promised brief and evidence never arrived over fifteen months.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed without examining the evidence.
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed without examining the evidence.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed without examining the evidence.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed without examining the evidence.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.