Outcome: Dismissed
Jul282009_02B2203
Our summary
An EB-1A petitioner claimed to meet at least three criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO found the petitioner failed to meet awards, membership, and published material criteria. Evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
- Membership · Membership did not require outstanding achievement as essential condition for admission
- Published material · Evidence from unknown internet source insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim
- Final merits · Achievements do not set petitioner significantly above almost all others in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards | |
| Not met | Membership did not require outstanding achievement as essential condition for admission | |
| Not met | Evidence from unknown internet source insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim | |
| Not met | Achievements do not set petitioner significantly above almost all others in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
