EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Jul282009_03B2203
AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least three regulatory criteria. AAO found petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim through awards, membership, or published material evidence, and did not establish eligibility as extraordinary ability alien.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner failed to submit evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized
- Membership · Petitioner failed to provide evidence of membership requiring outstanding achievement
- Published material · Published material was not primarily about petitioner or in major publications
- Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Petitioner failed to submit evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized |
 Membership | Not met | Petitioner failed to provide evidence of membership requiring outstanding achievement |
 Published material | Not met | Published material was not primarily about petitioner or in major publications |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.