Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Jun012009_02B2203

Published materialMetAwardsNot metCommercial successNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Artist claimed extraordinary ability in the arts. Met one criterion (published material) but failed to meet at least three required criteria or demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field. AAO affirmed denial.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Published material · Reviews and articles about petitioner published in major media sufficient

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards from 2000 and 2001 too stale; do not show sustained acclaim
  • Commercial success · Part of troupe; no evidence petitioner was reason for commercial success
  • Final merits · Overall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Published materialMetReviews and articles about petitioner published in major media sufficient
AwardsNot metAwards from 2000 and 2001 too stale; do not show sustained acclaim
Commercial successNot metPart of troupe; no evidence petitioner was reason for commercial success
Final meritsNot metOverall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.