Outcome: Dismissed
Jun012009_02B2203
Our summary
Artist claimed extraordinary ability in the arts. Met one criterion (published material) but failed to meet at least three required criteria or demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field. AAO affirmed denial.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Published material · Reviews and articles about petitioner published in major media sufficient
What was missing
- Awards · Awards from 2000 and 2001 too stale; do not show sustained acclaim
- Commercial success · Part of troupe; no evidence petitioner was reason for commercial success
- Final merits · Overall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Reviews and articles about petitioner published in major media sufficient | |
| Not met | Awards from 2000 and 2001 too stale; do not show sustained acclaim | |
| Not met | Part of troupe; no evidence petitioner was reason for commercial success | |
| Not met | Overall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
