EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Jun052009_05B2203
AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in athletics. The AAO found that counsel never specified which regulatory criteria were met, analyzed the most applicable evidence under awards criterion, and concluded neither the scholarship nor collegiate awards demonstrated sustained acclaim at the very top, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Scholarship and collegiate awards do not evidence rise to very top of field
- Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Scholarship and collegiate awards do not evidence rise to very top of field |
 Final merits | Not met | Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.