EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided March 2021Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
MAR022021_02B2203
ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetAwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
An actor seeks extraordinary ability classification. She claims seven criteria including published materials, judging, original contributions, exhibitions, and leading roles. AAO found only judging and exhibitions met; two criteria insufficient. Petitioner lacks demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim required for top-tier classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases established
- Judging · Evidence of participation in SAG Awards nomination judging process accepted
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award established
- Original contributions · Show in development, unaired; budget alone does not demonstrate significance
- Published material · Articles did not meet regulatory requirements; missing author, circulation data
- Final merits · Does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Exhibitions | Met | Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases established |
 Judging | Met | Evidence of participation in SAG Awards nomination judging process accepted |
 Awards | Not met | No major internationally recognized award established |
 Original contributions | Not met | Show in development, unaired; budget alone does not demonstrate significance |
 Published material | Not met | Articles did not meet regulatory requirements; missing author, circulation data |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but decision does not separately analyze this criterion |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but decision does not separately analyze this criterion |
 Final merits | Not met | Does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.