Outcome: Remanded
MAR052026_02B2203
Our summary
Entrepreneur who co-founded ventures in Georgia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met three initial criteria after identifying leading or critical role role not credited by SCOPS. Decision remanded for final merits determination regarding sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Evidence of participation as judge of work of others established
- Leading or critical role · Leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation established
- Published material · Evidence of publication about petitioner in professional or major media established
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award demonstrated
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Evidence of participation as judge of work of others established | |
| Met | Leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation established | |
| Met | Evidence of publication about petitioner in professional or major media established | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award demonstrated | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached; remanded for final merits determination by SCOPS |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
