Outcome: Dismissed
MAR072017_01D8101
Our summary
Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director finding that beneficiary met judging criterion was agreed with on appeal
- Leading or critical role · Director finding that beneficiary met critical role criterion for distinguished organization was agreed with on appeal
What was missing
- Membership · Insufficient evidence that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Original contributions · No evidence that beneficiary's work demonstrated original contributions of major significance in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director finding that beneficiary met judging criterion was agreed with on appeal | |
| Met | Director finding that beneficiary met critical role criterion for distinguished organization was agreed with on appeal | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | No evidence that beneficiary's work demonstrated original contributions of major significance in field | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
