Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1AEducation and academiaEmployerDecided 2017Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR072017_01D8101

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director finding that beneficiary met judging criterion was agreed with on appeal
  • Leading or critical role · Director finding that beneficiary met critical role criterion for distinguished organization was agreed with on appeal

What was missing

  • Membership · Insufficient evidence that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
  • Original contributions · No evidence that beneficiary's work demonstrated original contributions of major significance in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector finding that beneficiary met judging criterion was agreed with on appeal
Leading or critical roleMetDirector finding that beneficiary met critical role criterion for distinguished organization was agreed with on appeal
MembershipNot metInsufficient evidence that membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
Original contributionsNot metNo evidence that beneficiary's work demonstrated original contributions of major significance in field
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.