Outcome: Dismissed
MAR102026_04B5203
Our summary
Assistant professor with Ph.D. in computer science proposing STEM research endeavor claiming national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner not well-positioned to advance the endeavor; peer review is common academic activity, funding sources unclear, research citations narrowly circulated, insufficient evidence of feasibility or field impact.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Well positioned · Peer review activity insufficient; no consistent research funding or government interest demonstrated; limited evidence of field impact or feasibility.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Not analyzed; decision found second prong dispositive. | |
| Not met | Peer review activity insufficient; no consistent research funding or government interest demonstrated; limited evidence of field impact or feasibility. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because second prong failed; decision reserves analysis. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
