Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided March 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR102026_04B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Assistant professor with Ph.D. in computer science proposing STEM research endeavor claiming national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner not well-positioned to advance the endeavor; peer review is common academic activity, funding sources unclear, research citations narrowly circulated, insufficient evidence of feasibility or field impact.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Well positioned · Peer review activity insufficient; no consistent research funding or government interest demonstrated; limited evidence of field impact or feasibility.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedNot analyzed; decision found second prong dispositive.
Well positionedNot metPeer review activity insufficient; no consistent research funding or government interest demonstrated; limited evidence of field impact or feasibility.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because second prong failed; decision reserves analysis.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.