Outcome: Dismissed
MAR142024_10B5203
Our summary
An entrepreneur running an agricultural advisory business sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability together with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not satisfy three of the six exceptional ability criteria, and it reserved the Dhanasar prongs as unnecessary to decide.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Dhanasar prongs reserved because petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Claimed on appeal but not analyzed; decision reserved the Dhanasar issues. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Claimed on appeal but not analyzed; decision reserved the Dhanasar issues. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
