A marketing manager specializing in search engine optimization was proposed by a company for O-1A extraordinary ability in business. The appeal was summarily dismissed because the filing named no specific error of law or fact and the promised brief or evidence never arrived.

A self-represented EB-1A applicant requested sixty days to submit documentation but failed to provide anything within seven months. The AAO summarily dismissed for failure to identify specific errors or submit additional evidence.

Self-represented petitioner appealed EB-1A denial requesting sixty days to prepare documentation. More than seven months later, no evidence or arguments were submitted. The AAO summarily dismissed for failure to address reasons for denial and failure to provide supporting documentation.

Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to submit the promised brief and evidence within thirty days and did not address regulatory criteria or identify specific errors.