An exercise physiologist and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for work in exercise physiology and business. The AAO affirmed the service center's denial because the petitioner failed to demonstrate his proposed endeavor had national importance beyond his individual clients and lacked evidence of substantial economic impact.

A research scientist with Ph.D. in industrial engineering employed since 2021 sought EB-2 NIW for developing privacy-enhancing technology in digital advertising and healthcare. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding inadequately documented prospective national importance. Though research has merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate specific focus or impact rising to national importance. Later Dhanasar prongs were not reached.

A financial manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW classification. Director and AAO agreed substantial merit was established but national importance was not. Petitioner claimed her Brazil-focused financial business would create economic bridges, but lacked independent corroborating evidence; field importance alone was insufficient.

Electrical engineer employed to provide energy efficiency consulting and audits seeks NIW. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacks national importance; local impact on customers insufficient. Petitioner failed to show broader implications or substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar first prong.